Self-reliant warfighters might threaten the chain of command

An idealistic Spurdo wrote:

the usmc “witch-hunt” still leaves the problem itself unsolved: the need for every Soldier in the field to have organic Survival, Evasion, Resistance Escape (SERE) skills to survive off the land if lost/separated from his unit. This crap that everyone stay together like lemmings is often unworkable in war. Had Rother been trained to be more self-reliant and less as a weak lemming and known to walk only at NIGHT to conserve fluids, to leave more visible signals for searchers to find him, and make a solar still to collect water, he could have made it on his own to safety.

via comment at:

Yes, of course, if a country wants its military to win actual wars, self-reliant warfighters are preferable.

But the USA does not want its military to win wars. The USA wants its military to feed a wealthy, kleptocratic elite, while drawing out wars and warlike actions to the greatest possible durations. Self-reliant warfighters might throw one or more wrenches into those well-oiled gears.

Of course, as Sun Tzu once wrote, no country has ever benefited from prolonged war. So the USA war machine will not last forever.

This entry was posted in political economy. Bookmark the permalink.