Various thoughts on tyranny and hierarchy


The classic essay is potentially anti-Left:

http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm

and thus the Leftists hate it and tried to rebut it:

https://libcom.org/library/tyranny-of-tyranny-cathy-levine

See also relevant comments at:

http://www.historyisaweapon.com/indextrue.html

and


Further, there is an interesting Russophobic, anti-Putin hit piece at the Atlantic which ties into this theme:

The brilliance of this new type of authoritarianism is that instead of simply oppressing opposition, as had been the case with 20th-century strains, it climbs inside all ideologies and movements, exploiting and rendering them absurd. One moment Surkov would fund civic forums and human-rights NGOs, the next he would quietly support nationalist movements that accuse the NGOs of being tools of the West. With a flourish he sponsored lavish arts festivals for the most provocative modern artists in Moscow, then supported Orthodox fundamentalists, dressed all in black and carrying crosses, who in turn attacked the modern-art exhibitions. The Kremlin’s idea is to own all forms of political discourse, to not let any independent movements develop outside of its walls.

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/11/hidden-author-putinism-russia-vladislav-surkov/382489/


However, historians claim that this is nothing new:

http://home.uchicago.edu/~jpadgett/papers/published/robust.pdf

Advertisements
This entry was posted in political economy. Bookmark the permalink.