We’re going to watch it burn down. Well, at least DJ Jefani can sing better than Clint Black can.


 

 

I do not enjoy listening to the music of Clint Black. The post-911 years were hard for me, and hearing Clint Black was part of that. I think President Trump still plays Clint Black at some of his rallies. However, Q has recently linked to DJ Jefani. I’m not going to pick nits regarding the quality of DJ Jefani. It’s hard enough to sing under any circumstances; it’s harder still to compose original music and sing it well. Composing original music and getting others to approve of it is Sisyphean.

The /qresearch/ board had some technical glitches, possibly due to increased traffic. Both short-term and long-term stories are relevant in recent news. I argue that the Q narrative is gaining followers, and the mainstream narrative is losing followers.

Q mentioned several Twitter users as “VIP Patriots.” This recognition is probably meant to build up enthusiasm for public declarations of loyalty.  Everyone likes to be recognized for praiseworthy efforts. These people are tweeting their attendance at rallies. Q is praising them – presumably to build up political enthusiasm.

Interestingly, one of the chosen tweets reads “Patriotism is my drug of choice.” This might be a remarkably self-aware commentary on the dangers of excessive patriotism, but then again it is probably a wholesome, non-nuanced assertion of respectability.

Q wrote:

Q!!mG7VJxZNCI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_01s4Mut2YQ&feature=youtu.be📁
Well done, Patriot.
TOGETHER WE WIN.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q
https://twitter.com/Amberwinborn/status/1111334824151826433📁
Thank you, Patriot.
Sometimes our ‘sniffer’ picks and pulls w/o applying credit file.
Q
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1111214993293357056📁
FBI & DOJ to review the outrageous Jussie Smollett case in Chicago. It is an embarrassment to our Nation!”
>It shall be done.
Q

 


>>5944859 ————————————–——– ‘Knowingly’

>>5944536 rt >>5944467 ————————— (http://uscode.house.gov/ screencap

>>5944492 rt >>5944351 ————————— What does that tell you about the size of the movement?

>>5944447 ————————————–——– The Left are Sheep

>>5944119 ————————————–——– US Code Link: Treason, Sedition & Subversion (Cap: >>5944603)

>>5944004 ————————————–——– Follow keyword designators

>>5943751 rt >>5943535 ————————— Match?

>>5943665 rt >>5943598 ————————— Have you applied to an intel agency? (Cap: >>5943700)

>>5943535 ————————————–——– You have more than you know (Cap: >>5943769, >>5943884)

>>5943423 rt >>5943322 ————————— Predictable and Prepared

>>5943295 ————————————–——– Q in NZ bread: Michigan Rally 7pm Tonight

>>5943194 ————————————–——– THEY DO NOT LOVE YOU OR AMERICA.

>>5943130 ————————————–——– [Page 17] (Cap: >>5943220)

>>5943096 ————————————–——– Leaking investigations can lead to [forced] resignations.

Wednesday 03.27.2019

>>5935884 rt >>5935846 ————————— ‘WE’ are everywhere.

>>5935704 ————————————–——– We see you, Patriot! (Cap: >>5935754)

>>5935455 rt >>5935306 ————————— Chicago needs another hero

>>5935122 ————————————–——– FEDS (DOJ) will prosecute? (Cap: >>5936137)

>>5935020 ————————————–——– Did you enjoy the interview? (Cap: >>5936100)

>>5931177 rt >>5931148 ————————— Hannity in 10

>>5931097 rt >>5930977 ————————— Find the reflection inside the castle.

>>5930977 ————————————–——– Reflections are important.

>>5930643 rt >>5930471 ————————— Marker [2] Set.

>>5930471 rt >>5930421 ————————— Marker [1] Set.

>>5930410 ————————————–——– Shall we play another ‘Q Proof’ game?

>>5929587 rt >>5929491 ————————— Reference correct. Details [CLAS 1-99]

>>5929554 rt >>5929545 ————————— (Flag billows in sunlight pic)

>>5929534 ————————————–——– Indictment(s) coming? (Cap: >>5934674)

>>5928096 ————————————–——– Q Drop #3063

>>5928012 ————————————–——– DOJ coordination w/ UK re: DECLAS OF FISA?

>>5927994 ————————————–——– “Maximum transparency.” (Cap: >>5934542)

>>5926283 rt >>5926223 ————————— Watch Hannity tonight.

>>5926054 rt >>5925866 ————————— Some organizations do not have good intentions. (Cap: >>5934482)

>>5925256 rt >>5924784 ————————— Good luck, Patriot.


Anons noted many things, but only a few of them seem comprehensible and relevant:

#

 

>>5945769 Anon’s theory on timeline, NZ and the DS

>>5945755 8 members of billionaire Sackler family added to N.Y. opioid suit

>>5945607 , >>5945526, >>5945566. >>5945624 Ohr’s Ham radio: Timeline and past digs

>>5945487 , >>5945498, >>5945501 Sandy Hook Shooter’s Psychiatrist Arrested

>>5945295 Border Patrol Shuts All Checkpoints In New Mexico

>>5945209 , >>5945528 @HUDGov is charging FB for violating the Fair Housing Act

>>5945181 , >>5945390 Ohr transcript findings

>>5945171 Habberman: ‘cupped pepperoni’

>>5945154 Twitter may flag President Trump’s tweets that violate ‘rules’

#

>>5944612 , >>5944614 Timeline of events

>>5944416 Judicial Watch Tweet re RR

>>5944413 Full letter from Rep’s to Schiff this morning

>>5944406 Site breaks after Q links to the Gov. Code

>>5944374 After New Zealand Attacks, More People Registered to Move There

>>5944332 MITRE digg and the Podesta’s Italian connections

>>5944100 Anon: The [Killbox] is a [Keyword Indicator]

>>5943884 , >>5943874 Graphic: Initials from Q’s repost decoded

>>5943782 More digs on BCCI

>>5943749 Refresher: Nellie Ohr Graphic

#

>>5942999, >>5943000 GOP rep calls for investigation into Schiff

>>5942658 Robert Mueller has a lengthy record of framing innocent people to protect the guilty

>>5942595, >>5942599, >>5942616 DIG on Intel/Computer backdoors for CIA.

>>5942497 your viewers don’t trust you anymore: CNN’S BRIAN STELTER CLAIMS RATINGS ARE DOWN BECAUSE IT’S A SLOW NEWS WEEK

>>5942484 OIG report on actions taken in response to alleged civil rights and liberties violations by DOJ employees


In terms of long-term trends, consider the following:

MSNBC host Rachel Maddow lost half-a-million viewers in just one week after special counsel Robert Mueller’s report indicated that he did not find enough evidence to support collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Maddow has been one of the most prominent voices on the collusion conspiracy, spending most of her programs over the past two years on allegations that President Donald Trump coordinated with the Russian government to win the 2016 presidential election. Maddow struggled to hold back tears as she delivered her opening monologue last Friday, clearly stunned that Mueller did not bring any indictments against the president or his family.

The implosion of the Russian collusion narrative damaged more than just Maddow’s ego — it also destroyed her ratings, at least temporarily.

“The Rachel Maddow Show” on MSNBC delivered monster ratings for the network, cementing the cable host as the left-wing foil to Fox News’ Sean Hannity. Maddow consistently finished 1st or 2nd in overall cable news ratings over the past year, sometimes garnering more than 3 million viewers.

But according to The Daily Beast, Maddow’s show dropped 500,000 viewers in just one week after the Mueller report dropped.

“Maddow, who has consistently vied for the first or second top-rated cable news program, was sixth on Monday evening, down almost 500,000 total viewers from the previous Monday, as was MSNBC’s second top-rated program in primetime, ‘The Last Word With Lawrence O’Donnell,’” The Daily Beast reported.

Hannity nearly doubled Maddow’s ratings this past Monday, delivering just more than 4 million viewers compared to Maddow’s 2.5 million.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/27/msnbc-rachel-maddow-tv-ratings-russia-collusion/

 

For years, Rachel Maddow has enforced the limits of the Overton Window. Now she finally seems to be losing whatever mainstream appeal she had; of course, it is to be expected that some fanatics will believe her, even if she claims that the sky is plaid and water runs uphill. The mainstream media has been a propaganda operation for decades. Finally, it seems that the man in the street has rejected some of that particular type of propaganda. However, I do not advise uncritical belief of Hannity. I am not convinced that anyone in the news business deserves uncritical trust, even if Sara Carter and John Solomon might be much more honest than Rachel Maddow.

This entry was posted in current events. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments?

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.