With apologies to The Exploited, I submit that Cyberpunk 2077 is not dead.
From the comment section:
Matthew Ehret thinks the British are to blame for the conspiracies to take over the world:
Before his 2020 Soros-sponsored regime change, Trump was the first American president in over 50 years who had posed a serious threat to the deep state, resulting in a four year effort by the highest echelons of the Anglo-American oligarchy to lead an evidence-free impeachment campaign based on the narrative that Russia had hacked the DNC and put Trump into power. The head of every neoliberal think tank in America suffered obsessive Trump Derangement syndrome, and even the British House of Lords had stated irrevocably that Trump’s re-election was an intolerable scenario for the empire.
YET… Trump supported (and still supports) Zionists.
So does that make Trump a Zionist shill deserving of a Soros-directed regime change as many of his detractors claim? Or is something else going on?
Well, if Israel truly was a causal agency in world affairs, one might say “yes”. However, from the 19th century creation of Zionism within the bowels of Britain’s Foreign Office by the Earl of Shaftesbury and the Palestinian Exploration Fund of 1865 to the Anglo-French Sykes Pikot Agreement of 1916, to the Lord Balfour Declaration of 1917 to the Round Table-steered Versailles Treaty that put Palestine under British control in 1919, Zionism was always a reactive agency of the British Empire and never causal as a top down process. Even the powerful B’nai Brith was created by British Freemasonic organizations in America hosting a Grand Master, degrees of initiation, and masonic symbolism from its 1875 founding to the present.
If any of this history is new to you, I’d suggest stopping immediately and reviewing Cynthia Chung’s brilliant ‘Who Really Runs the Middle East‘ before proceeding onward.
It isn’t just Zionism
British manipulation of radical ideologies across the Middle East doesn’t end with Zionism, but connects right to the heart of Wahhabism and the Muslim Brotherhood, both of which were the fruits of British Imperial intrigues at the onset of the 20th century. Don’t believe me? Well would you be surprised to find out that the Muslim Brotherhood which has played such a major role in the rise of Islamic fundamentalism was created by British Freemasons? Because it was.
Or would you be surprised to discover that Saudi Arabia is a nation who just celebrated its 80th birthday whose very name merely derives from a family of warlords that Britain decided to place atop a new kingdom in 1930? Some of that story was even told in the 1963 film Laurence of Arabia… but only some of it. The rise of Islamic terrorism that such geopoliticians as Zbigniew Brzezinski, Sir Henry Kissinger and Sir Bernard Lewis unleashed as a weapon against the Soviet Union was tied deeply into this British-created dynamic… and these Anglophile sociopaths knew it.
The fact that Israel hated such anti-nation state Wellsian technocrats as Barack Obama should not be a mystery, nor should their support of Trump’s pro-nationalist presidency be a mystery either. The total change in Turkey’s own Modus Operandi towards a pro-Russia/China program since Putin transformed the “rules of the regime-change game” in the Middle East in 2015 should also not be a mystery. Neither should the 20 Arab Nations which have signed onto China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
All of these seemingly opposing power structures were promised certain managerial powers of major jurisdictions of the world after the collapse of the western neo-liberal order on the condition that they just acted according to certain commands, and did the dirty work of their masters. Drug money laundering? Black ops? Terrorist financing? Oil price manipulation? Covert assassination? Every dirty game necessary to undermine sovereign nation states was on the table in those turbulent post-WWII years and these British-controlled power structures were messy, loud, and effective.
Even in the “developed sector”, certain nefarious 20th century power structures were assigned to take private control of vast sectors of the economy including energy, agriculture, medicine, banking, communications, and pharmaceuticals. These networks interfaced closely with organized crime networks giving birth to such North American dirty operations as the Bronfman Family, Mayer Lansky and even such weird politicos as Roy Cohn who went onto endorse a young Donald Trump entering politics in the 1980s. Even though many of these western criminal syndicates were also heavily connected to Zionism, it would be wrong to conclude that the Jews are running the world. It just means that one layer of organized crime influenced lower levels of organized crime. Each layer being promised vast rewards as long as they willingly accepted the fact that when the system they parasitically fed upon collapsed, they would adapt to that depopulated order accordingly. British cut out (and Soros mirror image) Maurice Strong laid out this agenda in an infamous 1990 interview with West Magazine asking “hypothetically”:
“What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group’s conclusion is ‘no’. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”
Read the whole thing at:
A rather notable site for humanities research
I think this writer is wrong about Zeus but maybe it is worth reading
Keep eating meat
Locker was not as smart as Jefferson
You should read more Agorist
What is r dot nf?
You should post morew stuff like this
The Sassoon family was evil
Bernays was evil and he was bad for America
More scholarship less politics
Manage your time
A very broad interpretation of what can be called LARPing
Autism in court