Voting woes: the non-nationalism of democratic voters, and the open borders of modern politics


vlcsnap-2014-11-02-13h23m43s119
If you register to vote, there’s no guarantee that you’ll be allowed to vote:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/30/50-000-missing-georgia-voter-registration-applications-nothing-to-see-here.html

However, many of those who are not allowed to vote have been voting:

http://12160.info/page/massive-non-citizen-voting-uncovered-in-maryland

Against this backdrop, it is not surprising to see that Dampier criticizes the political situation:

Who Needs Nationalism?

Since World War II, all the great powers have repudiated previous-held doctrines of rights to ethno-religious self-determination that became popular after the European upheavals of 1848. The victorious Allies supplanted European nationalism with an internationalist set of Universal Human Rights which repudiates the idea of ethnic and religious exclusivity that nationalism requires.

The obvious reason why this happened is because the USSR was an internationalist Marxist dictatorship. The US is and was a universalist democratic world-Empire with an elite intimate with the USSR. Internationalists conceived of and manned the new international system with all its acronym’d financial-political institutions.

The authorities forbade nationalism in Europe during the post-war, while encouraging it in the third world.

You can be a Cuban nationalist, an Angolan nationalist, a Palestinian nationalist, a Peruvian nationalist, or a black South African nationalist, but you can’t be a German nationalist, because Hitler was a German nationalist, and we all know how that turned out.

While there have been some unprincipled exceptions in the 20th century, such as the Jewish nationalist state of Israel, Rhodesia, and apartheid South Africa, the international community tends to correct for these exceptions when they stop being politically tenable.

In many European countries, expressing nationalism of any sort, especially white ethnic nationalism, is often a crime punishable by jail time.

In the United States, since the passage of civil rights legislation, ethnic nationalism is not a political crime as it is in Europe, but it is a class of business crime. Much like how the IRS relies on business owners to collect taxes on its behalf, the EEOC relies on business owners to police speech that might threaten egalitarian norms regarding ethnicity and gender. It’s not illegal to express a preference for palefaces over the rest, but preferring palefaces in hiring will get your business fined or seized by the government.

And Paul Craig Roberts says:

Elections serve only to validate the unaccountability of government.

http://www.unz.com/proberts/dysfunctional-america/

This entry was posted in political economy. Bookmark the permalink.

comments with fewer than 4 links should be auto-approved if everything works properly...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.